Protect Pension and Spouse Beneficiary With Financial Planning Now AARP Eve
Protect Pension and Spouse Beneficiary With Financial Planning Now - AARP Eve...
Do you make the grade for your age?
— Receive access to exclusive retirement tools, resources, benefits and discounts It's common to say, "I'll take Social Security at 62 so that, if I die early, I won't have lost income that I should have had." That could be a two-way mistake. First, if you're healthy, you'll probably than you expect. By , you're storing up extra income for your retirement's later years. Second, married people shouldn't think only of their incomes today. If the husband, say, was the main breadwinner, the longer he waits before collecting, the larger the income he'll leave to his surviving spouse, if he dies first.
How to Financially Protect Your Spouse
When faced with decisions about pension benefits shortsighted choices now can cause harm in the future
Brian Stauffer Decisions regarding your pension benefits can impact what your spouse receives down the road. I had lunch recently with a friend whose husband, a teacher, retired five years ago. "We made a big mistake with his company ," she told me. "We took the wrong one." Pensions come in two versions — a larger check that covers only the lifetime of the person who earned it, and a smaller check that also covers the lifetime of his or her spouse. They chose the to give themselves more money to spend. Now, they both wish they'd taken the version that covered her, too. The prospect of losing his pension income if he dies first has left her a little scared. Unfortunately, that's a common story — and not only for pension decisions. Caring partners each want the other to be financially protected, if left alone. But sometimes they make shortsighted choices or accidentally cut a spouse out of money that he or she needs by failing to submit the right paperwork. Here are four things should think about that can save a spouse from financial harm:Leave a larger income
When will you start taking ? A relative of mine, who retired (with pension) at 60 and now has a different and well-paying job, intended to take his Social Security at 62. When I heard that, I yelped. His wife has savings and a pension of her own, and they don't need extra money now. If he waits until 66 to collect, his Social Security check will be 33 percent larger (plus inflation adjustments) than if he starts at 62. It will be a fat 76 percent higher if he waits until 70.Money Matters
Maybe not yet; they have work to doDo you make the grade for your age?
— Receive access to exclusive retirement tools, resources, benefits and discounts It's common to say, "I'll take Social Security at 62 so that, if I die early, I won't have lost income that I should have had." That could be a two-way mistake. First, if you're healthy, you'll probably than you expect. By , you're storing up extra income for your retirement's later years. Second, married people shouldn't think only of their incomes today. If the husband, say, was the main breadwinner, the longer he waits before collecting, the larger the income he'll leave to his surviving spouse, if he dies first.